A Qualitative Study of Psychosocial Work Environment among Sanitation Workers of a Teaching Hospital in South India

Cynthia S Subhaprada, Venkateswarlu Uppara, Sreedevi Arepalli

Abstract


Objective: Occupational health, today, looks at a new idea, i.e., psychological health and safety which is about safeguarding the psychological health of employee by providing a workplace that promotes employees’ psychological well-being by preventing psychological harm to employee. The purpose of this study is to assess the psychosocial work environment among sanitation workers.

Methods: A qualitative study was carried out during June-July, 2016 among women sanitation workers of Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Institutional Ethical Committee clearance and the permission from the work supervisor were obtained. Out of 33 women sanitation workers, 10 women fulfilling the inclusion criteria, selected by purposive and criterion sampling, were identified as the discussion participants. Informed consent was obtained. Focus group discussion was conducted to explore the opinions and views on their psychological well-being influenced by job satisfaction, psychosocial safety, social support, workload and physical health. The observations were recorded and qualitative data analysis was done by ordering and coding.

Results: The preliminary thematic analysis of data showed that all of them agree on job satisfaction, social support, good interpersonal relations and sufficient time to complete the allotted work on a single working day of 8 hours duration, hence psychological safety and protection. Most of them opined that they did not have to quit the job due to work related health issues but were of the view that in the long run, they would develop knee joint problems and backache. They suggested that incentives and rewards need to be given to boost them. Job insecurity was a common fear among them as it is contractual in nature.

Conclusions: Good interpersonal relationship, social support and good psychosocial environment are the common themes. They should be given assurance on job security with periodic performance appraisal.

Keywords


Interpersonal relations, Psychological well being, Social support

Full Text:

PDF

References


ILO-WHO. Psychosocial factors at work. www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/ilo_who_1984_report_of_the_joint_committee.pdf.

European Commission. Guidance on work-related stress: Spice of life or kiss of death? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.

Cox T, Griffiths A, Rial-González E. Research on work-related stress. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: 2000.

Kompier M. The psychosocial work environment and health- What do we know and where should we go? [Editorial]. Scand J Work Environ Health; 2002, 28 (1): 1–4.

Paoli P, Merllié D. Third European survey on working conditions. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2001.

Ware JE Jr. The status of health assessment. Annu Rev Public Health; 1995, 16: 327-354.

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M. Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disor¬ders, a systematic review. Occup Med (Lond), 2010, 60, 277-86.

Tang K. A reciprocal interplay between psychosocial job stressors and worker well-being? A systematic review of the “reversed” effect. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2014, 40, 441-56.

Bech P, Gudex C, Staehr Johansen K. The WHO (Ten) Well-Being Index: Validation in Diabetes. Psychother Psychosom; 1996, 65: 183-190.

Warr P, Banks M, Ullah P. The experience of unemployment among black and white urban teenagers. Br J Psychol; 1985, 76: 75-87.

Staehr Johansen. Multicentre Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Pump Feasibility and Acceptability Study Experience. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1989.

Kristiansen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire-A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2005, 31, 438-49.

Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health, 1988, 78, 1336-42.

Johnson JV, Hall EM, Theorell T. Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a random sample of the Swedish male working population. Scand J Work Environ Health, 1989, 15, 271–9.

Karasek RA Jr. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q, 1979, 24, 285–308.

Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R. The measurement of effort- reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med, 2004, 58, 1483–99. [Medline] [Cross Ref]

Mazzola JJ, Schonfeld IS, Spector PE. What qualitative research has taught us about occupational stress. Stress and Health. 2011, 27 (2): 93–110.

Mackenzie R Catherine, Dominic Keuskamp, Anna M Ziersch, Fran E Baum, and Jennie Popay.

A qualitative study of the interactions among the psychosocial work environment and family, community and services for workers with low mental health. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 796.

Bourbonnais R, Jauvin N, Dussault J, Vézina M. Psychosocial work environment, interpersonal violence at work and mental health among correctional officers, 2007.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Preventive, Curative & Community Medicine