Bullying, Safe Schools and Public Health: An Overview in Connecticut Private Schools
Abstract
Introduction: As evident in the literature, bullying is frequently reported as a public health issue which affects the health and well-being of its victims. Bullying can also negatively impact student academic performance, leading to failure in school as evidenced by high and unacceptable drop-out rates and withdrawals.
Objective: This research aimed to examine the issue of bullying from a public health point of view and to assess the issue in a specific region of Connecticut’s private school network. Furthermore, the study will assess the role of a Safe School Climate Coordinator in developing and implementing programs in schools
that can serve as effective policy measures to improve school safety with the goal of reducing or eliminating bullying activities in the school environment.
Methods: The research employed the qualitative methodology from which six key themes emerged: mental health support; resource constraints; impact and influence of technology and social media; clear definition and distinction of bullying, harassment, and teasing; parental involvement and support; and importance and significance of the network’s culture. Nine participants from seven private schools in Connecticut took part in semi-structured interviews that were specially designed and conducted by the researchers. The nature of the interviews allowed participants to provide useful insights into the role they played in enhancing school climate by carefully developing and implementing policies and programs that reject violence and promote a school environment that is safe and conducive to learning.
Findings: All participants expressed concerns over to the limited mental health services and support that is available within the private school system. All cited the possibility that students are under extreme pressure, and that students are often negatively affected by their home and living environments. These exposures can increase the urge to “act out” while they are in school. Due to the network’s strict policy on bullying and any related behavior, there is ongoing monitoring to ensure there is adherence to the requirements. One administrator noted that the individual who was responsible for the Newtown incident had mental health issues.Another administrator opined that recently more referrals have been made to the Department of Children and Families than ever before. There are genuine concerns about what is going on and home environment. When students come into the school environment, they should have a positive outlook and willingness to learn. The message that is conveyed through the interviews is that there is great worry about the future of some students. Mental health support would be helpful in elevating some of the problems that they see in the school environment and work hard to prevent.
Conclusion: Where bullying is concerned, the public health toll is great and can have physical and emotional effects throughout the life of those who participate or are targeted. All efforts made to mitigate these deleterious effects in the early years of child and adolescence development is paramount in supporting the psychological well-being of the students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Sociological Association. (2011, August 23).
Bullying victims often suffer academically, particularly
high achieving Blacks and Latinos [Press release].
Retrieved from http://www.asanet.org/press/bullying_
victims_often_suffer_academically.cfm.
Ascher, C. (1994). Gaining control of violence in the
schools: A view from the field. ERIC Digest No. 100.
(ED377256).
Black, G. L. (2010). Correlational analysis of servant
leadership and school climate. Catholic Education:
A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 13(4), 437-466.
Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/
viewcontent.cgi?article=1659 &context=ce.
Bourne, P. A., Pinnock C., & Blake, D. K. (2012). The
influence of violent crimes on health in Jamaica: A
spurious correlation and an alternative paradigm.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 6(1),
-12. Retrieved from http://www.jcdr. net/articles/
PDF/1860/2%20-%203179.1.pdf.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human
development: Experiments by nature and design.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human
beings HUMAN: Bioecological perspectives on human
development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bullying Definition.(n.d.)Retrieved from Stopbullying.
gov: http://www.stopbullying.gov/what-is-bullying/
definition/index.html.
Bullying Statistics.(n.d.).Bullying statistics 2010.
Retrieved from http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/
content/bullying-statistics-2010.html.
Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and
management: Theory, policy, and practice. South
African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391-406. Retrieved
from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/426/.
Buxton, D., Patel Potter, M., & Bostic, J. Q. (2013). Coping
strategies for child bully-victims. Pediatric Annals, 42(4),
-61. doi:10.3928/00904481-20130326-08.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011,
April 22). Bullying among middle school and high
school students: Massachusetts, 2009. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, 60(15) 465-471. Retrieved
from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ preview/mmwrhtml/
mm6015a1.htm.
Cohen, J. (2010). School climate: Engaging the whole
village, teaching the whole child. The Challenge,
(4), 1-2. Retrieved from https://www.edpubs.gov/
document/ ed005207w.pdf?ck=4.
Cohen, J., & Freiberg, J. A. (2013). School climate and
bullying prevention. In T. Dary& T. Pickeral (Eds.), School
climate practices for implementation and sustainability
(School Climate Practice Brief No. 1; pp. 47-51). NewYork, NY: National School Climate Center. Retrieved
from http://www.schoolclimate.org/ publications/
documents/SchoolClimatePracticeBriefs-2013.pdf.
Connecticut General Assembly, Commission on
Children. (2011, July 21). Anti-bullying bill becomes
law. Retrieved from https://www.cga.ct.gov/coc/pdfs/
bullying/2011_ bullying_law.pdf.
Elledge, L. C., Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., DePaolis, K.
J., Little, T. D., &Salmivalli, C. (2013). Individual and
contextual predictors of cyberbullying: The influence
of children’s provictim attitudes and teachers’ ability
to intervene. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5),
-710. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9920-x.
Eisenmann, J. C., Gentile, D. A., Welk, G. J., Callahan,
R., Strickland, S., Walsh, M., & Walsh, D.A. (2008).
SWITCH: Rationale, design, and implementation of a
community, school, and family-based intervention to
modify behaviors related to childhood obesity. BMC
Public Health, 8, 223-232. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-
-223.
Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger,
M. E., & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014).Bullying surveillance
among youths: Uniform definitions for public health
and recommended data elements. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/violence prevention/pdf/bullyingdefinitions-
final-a.pdf.
Guerra, N. H., Williams, K. R., &Sadek, S. (2011).
Understanding bullying and victimization during
childhood and adolescence: A mixed methods study.
Child Development, 82(1), 295-310. doi:10.1111/
j.1467-8624.2010.01556.x.
Hamburger, M. E., Basile, K. C., &Vivolo, A. M. (2011).
Measuring bullying victimization, perpetration,
and bystander experiences: A compendium of
assessment tools. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.
gov/violenceprevention/pdf/bullycompendium-a.pdf.
Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection
methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups
[Training manual]. Retrieved from Rand National
Defense Research Institute: http://www.rand.org/
content/dam/rand/pubs/ technical_reports/2009/
RAND_TR718.pdf.
Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001).
Naturalistic observations of peer interventions
in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512-527.
doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00178.
Henderson, T., Hill, C., & Norton, K. (2014, October).
The connection between missing school and health:
A review of chronic absenteeism and student health
in Oregon. Retrieved from Upstream Public Health:
https://www.upstreampublichealth.org/ sites/default/
files/Chronic%20Absence%20and%20Health%20
Review%20FINAL%2010.10.2014.pdf.
Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research
dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hinduja, S., &Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An
exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and
victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156. doi:
1080/01639620701457816.
Hughes, W. H., &Pickeral, T. (2013). School climate and
shared leadership. In T. Dary, & T. Pickeral (Eds.), School
climate practices for implementation and sustainability
(School Climate Practice Brief No. 1). Retrieved
from https://www.schoolclimate.org/publications/
documents/sc-brief-leadership.pdf.
Kim, Y. S., & Leventhal, B. (2008). Bullying and suicide.
A review.International Journal of Adolescent Medicine
and Health, 20(2), 133-154. doi:10.1515/ijamh.
20.2.133.
Levacic, R. (2009). Teacher incentives and performance:
An application of principal–agent theory. Oxford
Development Studies, 37(1), 33-46. doi:10.1080/
Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J.
Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The
nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective
(pp. 7–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
Patton, M. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and
research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Pepler,
D. J., & Craig, W. (2000). Making a difference in
bullying [Report 60]. Retrieved from LaMarsh Centre
for Research on Violence and Conflict Resolution:
http://peacefulschoolsinternational.org/wp-content/
uploads/making_a_ difference_in_bullying.pdf.
Perlus, J. G., Brooks-Russell, A., Wang, J., &Iannotti,
R. J. (2014). Trends in bullying, physical fighting, and
weapon carrying among 6th- through 10th-grade
students from 1998 to 2010: Findings from a national
study. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 1,100-
,106. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301761.
Rigby, K. (2001). Health consequences of bullying and
its prevention in schools. In J. Juvonen & S.Graham
(Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the
vulnerable and victimized (pp. 310–331). New York,
NY: Guilford.
Ross, S. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The
principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63,
-139. Retrieved from https://www.aeaweb.org/
aer/ top20/63.2.134-139.pdf.
Simon, P., &Olson, S. (Rapporteurs). (2014). Building
capacity to reduce bullying: Workshop summary.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Soyibo, K., & Lee, M. G. (2000). Domestic and school
violence among high school students in Jamaica. West
Indian Medical Journal, 49(3), 232-236. Retrieved from
Pubmed.gov. (PMID: 11076217).
Srabstein, J. C. (2009). Be aware of bullying: A critical
public health responsibility. American Medical
Association Journal of Ethics, 11(2), 173-177.
doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.2.oped1-0902.
Srabstein, J. C., & Leventhal, B. L. (2010).Preventionof bullying-related morbidity and mortality: A call for
public health policies. Bulletin of the World Health
Organization, 88(6), 403. doi:10.2471/blt.10.077123.
Stanley, P. H., Juhnke, G. A., &Purkey, W. N.
(2004). Using an invitational theory and practice
to create safe and successful schools. Journal of
Counseling and Development, 82(3), 302-309.
doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00314.x.
Stringer, E. T. (2014).Action research (4th ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Wimberly, G. L. (2002).
School relationships foster success for African American
students: ACT policy report. Retrieved from ERIC
database. (ED475196).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Advanced Research in Psychology & Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.